Whereas the Rohingya, a Muslim minority resident population in what is now Myanmar/Burma that dates back to the 15th century, has suffered discrimination and persecution since at least the end of World II and 1948, when Myanmar/Burma gained its independence; and
Whereas proscription and persecution of the Rohingya under successive military governments have increased progressively since the late 1970’s, with denial of education, economic opportunity, even identity, ghettoization and loss of citizenship; and
Whereas the rabbis of the Talmud forbid selling “weapons or accessories of weapons” to dangerous individuals or groups, as well as “grind[ing] any weapon” or even selling a certain kind of iron predominantly used for weapons lest we find ourselves contributing to bloodshed (Avodah Zarah 15b-16a); and
Whereas Rambam explains that this prohibition extends to selling “anything injurious to the public, like the weapons of war or instruments of torture. . . in order to not aid the destroyers of the world in destroying.” (Commentary to the Mishnah, AZ 1:7); and
Whereas attacks on local police posts and one military base by small, uncoordinated insurgent groups of Rohingya in 2016-17 have been used as a pretext for the military to wage the equivalent of pogroms on Rohingya villages in the name of anti-terrorism, forcing an estimated 640,000, a majority of the population, to flee to neighboring Bangladesh, where they have been interned as refugees in what is, in effect, a massive rural slum; and
Whereas the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights, the United States Department of State, and the British government as well as global media like The New York Times have documented and condemned the assault on the Rohingya as ethnic cleansing, the United States Holocaust Memorial Museum considers them the minority most at risk of genocide, and UN and US officials have discussed the possibility of prosecution of those responsible for crimes against humanity; and
Whereas there is not currently a workable solution to the statelessness of the Rohingya, since absorption of 650,000 people with minimal skills and no resources is not an option, and a recent repatriation agreement is both unworkable and unenforceable;[1] and;
Whereas a minority population with no sanitation, no potable drinking water and no future is a threat to public health and regional stability with global implications; and
Whereas we as Jews are especially struck by the startling parallels between the ethnic cleansing of the Rohingya and German treatment of Jews – the Nuremberg laws, the “Kristallnacht” pogrom of 1938, the Einsatzgruppen in Poland and the Soviet Union;
Now, therefore, be it resolved that the Rabbinical Assembly and its members from nations around the world will urge our elected representatives to press the government of Myanmar/Burma in all possible ways such as trade sanctions, denial of arms transfers and denial of visas in order to protect the Rohingya community; and
Be it further resolved that the Rabbinical Assembly and its members will join organizations already active on this issue through the Jewish Rohingya Justice Network about ways we can help the Rohingya; and
Be it further resolved that the Rabbinical Assembly commend the leadership of the United States Senate and House of Representatives for strongly passing resolutions condemning the violence against the Rohingya and calling for sanctions against the government of Myanmar; and
Be it further resolved that the Rabbinical Assembly will work to acquaint our organizations with, and remind our constituents of, the nature and magnitude of the ethnic cleansing being brutally waged against the Rohingya by Burma/Myanmar, and remind them that now is the time to speak out - Never Again.
[1] https://www.cnn.com/2018/01/23/asia/bangladesh-rohingya-repatriation-fears-intl/index.html
Comments
adding call for Israel to stop arms sales to Burma
Submitted by jilljacobs on Thu, 03/01/2018 - 10:42
Thank you for this powerful statement. Given that there is already a rabbinic movement, both in Israel and the US, to ask Israel to stop selling arms to Burma (and to pass legislation similar to that in the US establishing clarity about the boundaries for arms sales), we should add a "Be it resolved" that the RA calls on Israel to pass such legislation and to end arms sales to Burma. Happy to help with the wording.
Response to Jill Jacobs
Submitted by misafra on Tue, 03/06/2018 - 17:45
In reply to adding call for Israel to stop arms sales to Burma by jilljacobs
Full disclosure, I was involved in writing the resolution.
I am not in favor of adding an ammendment regarding arm sales. There is a bit of ambiguity and ,lack of clarity regarding the sales; media reports indicated that they were to stop, and now it is unclear. I also worry that adding in a clause about Israel will change the headline. Instead of "Rabbinical Assembly calls for more education and action to help the Rohingya in Bangladesh," it will be "Rabbinical Assembly condemns Israel." In my opinion, the current language condemns arm sales to Burma by implication; saying it straight out will threaten everything else that we want to say with this resolution. Tafasta meruba lo tafasta.
Adding call to Israel re arms sales
Submitted by mikie.goldstein on Wed, 03/07/2018 - 15:21
In reply to adding call for Israel to stop arms sales to Burma by jilljacobs
I wholely concur with Jill. The board of the Israel region of the RA has already called upon the government of Israel to stop Israeli companies from sellings arms to Burma. The government's reply to our request was that the government doesn't sell arms to Burma...
The atrocities against the Rohingya are horrible.. but-
Submitted by lavinsky on Thu, 03/01/2018 - 17:42
These atrocities are terrible, but we need to be aware that the Rohingya have undeniable ties to terrorist states and organizations, and given a chance, would certainly kill as many Jews as possible.
Their acts of terrorism are not just alleged against the Burmese, but other groups of Buddhists and Hindus as well. Their signature atrocity seems to be rape - the "calling card" of Islamofascist savages.
While I do not condone their terrible treatment, I do not want to be their allies in any way. Consider the following analogy: ISIS is fighting Assad in Syria.... which side to want to be on? I suggest "neither". I am similarly distrustful of many of the Islamist Rohingya. Do we really have a dog in this race? I don't think so. I would also liken this to supporting Morsi during the Arab Spring in Egypt. He was part of a popular uprising, but that uprising was an Islamist one - caused the deaths of many innocents - and does not serve the cause of peace in the world.
Here is an article from a man who was a military attache to Israel among other things.
https://www.gatestoneinstitute.org/11213/myanmar-islamists-terrorists